H.I. & anor (Albania) v The Minister for Justice and Equality & ors (Approved) [2018] IEHC 275 (19 April 2018)
The applications fail because the subsidiary protection refusal and deportation orders are validly based on both the assessment of state protection and independent credibility findings; material submitted is presumed considered unless proven otherwise.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 275
- Parties
- Applicants: H. I. and H. I (Albania); Applicants: A. I., B. I. and H. I. (a minor suing by his father and next friend A. I.); Respondents: The Minister for Justice and Equality, The Attorney General and Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subsidiary Protection, Deportation Orders, Credibility Assessment, State Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
H. I. and H. I (Albania)
Applicants
A. I., B. I. and H. I. (a minor suing by his father and next friend A. I.)
Applicants
The Minister for Justice and Equality, The Attorney General and Ireland
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of subsidiary protection refusal
- 2 Validity of deportation orders
- 3 Adequacy of state protection assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The applications fail because the subsidiary protection refusal and deportation orders are validly based on both the assessment of state protection and independent credibility findings; material submitted is presumed considered unless proven otherwise.
Court Disposition
applications dismissed
Orders
- Each application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment