Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank v O'Malley [2019] IESC 84 (29 November 2019)

Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank v O'Malley [2019] IESC 84 (29 November 2019)

The special indorsement of claim and the evidence provided by Bank of Ireland did not contain sufficient detail as to how the sum claimed was calculated, failing to meet the requirements of Order 4, rule 4 of the Rules of the Superior Courts and the standard for summary judgment. The absence of a breakdown or explanation of the calculation of the debt meant the plaintiff did not discharge its initial evidential burden, and summary judgment was not appropriate.

Citation
[2019] IESC 84
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank; Defendant/appellant: Joseph O'Malley
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
29 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (summary Judgment) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; matter remitted to High Court for further proceedings.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Particularisation of Debt Claims, Burden of Proof in Summary Proceedings, Pleading Requirements, Evidence in Debt Recovery
Civil Procedure Banking Law Summary Judgment Particularisation of Debt Claims Burden of Proof in Summary Proceedings Pleading Requirements Evidence in Debt Recovery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank

Plaintiff/respondent

Joseph O'Malley

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (summary Judgment) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What level of detail is required in the special indorsement of claim and evidence for summary judgment in a debt action?
  2. 2 Did the plaintiff provide sufficient particulars and evidence to justify summary judgment for a liquidated sum?

Ratio Decidendi

The special indorsement of claim and the evidence provided by Bank of Ireland did not contain sufficient detail as to how the sum claimed was calculated, failing to meet the requirements of Order 4, rule 4 of the Rules of the Superior Courts and the standard for summary judgment. The absence of a breakdown or explanation of the calculation of the debt meant the plaintiff did not discharge its initial evidential burden, and summary judgment was not appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; matter remitted to High Court for further proceedings.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed.
  • Matter remitted to the High Court.