T OS v C OS (Approved) [2025] IEHC 538 (20 March 2025)
An attorney under an Enduring Power of Attorney executed under the Powers of Attorney Act 1996 does not have authority to represent the donor in divorce proceedings, as divorce involves status issues beyond business and financial affairs; a guardian ad litem must be appointed to represent the incapacious respondent.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 538
- Parties
- Applicant: T OS; Respondent: C OS
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Divorce / Interlocutory Judgment Regarding Representation of Incapacious Respondent
- Outcome
- Appointment of guardian ad litem for Respondent; proceedings to be reconstituted accordingly.
- Legal Topics
- Enduring Power of Attorney, Divorce, Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem, Capacity and Consent in Divorce Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T OS
Applicant
C OS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Divorce / Interlocutory Judgment Regarding Representation of Incapacious Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an attorney under an Enduring Power of Attorney can represent a donor in divorce proceedings
- 2 Scope of authority under the Powers of Attorney Act 1996
- 3 Appropriate representation for incapacious respondent in divorce proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
An attorney under an Enduring Power of Attorney executed under the Powers of Attorney Act 1996 does not have authority to represent the donor in divorce proceedings, as divorce involves status issues beyond business and financial affairs; a guardian ad litem must be appointed to represent the incapacious respondent.
Court Disposition
Appointment of guardian ad litem for Respondent; proceedings to be reconstituted accordingly.
Orders
- Guardian ad litem to be appointed for Respondent; parties to propose suitable candidate.
- In-camera rule lifted to allow attorney and sibling to attend.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment