T.S. -v- E.S. [2016] IEHC 231 (04 May 2016)
The removal of M. M. S. was wrongful under the Hague Convention and Brussels II bis, but the grave risk exception and the child's clear objection to return, combined with the applicant's failure to provide adequate protective arrangements, justify refusal to order the child's return to England and Wales.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 231
- Parties
- Applicant: T. S.; Respondent: E. S.; Notice Party: M. S.; Notice Party: E. S. Snr.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Application Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for return of child refused
- Legal Topics
- International Child Abduction, Custody Rights, Habitual Residence, Grave Risk Exception, Child's Objection Exception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T. S.
Applicant
E. S.
Respondent
M. S.
Notice Party
E. S. Snr.
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Application Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the removal of M. M. S. to Ireland was wrongful under the Hague Convention and Brussels II bis
- 2 Whether the 'grave risk' exception under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention applies
- 3 Whether the child's objection to return should be determinative
Ratio Decidendi
The removal of M. M. S. was wrongful under the Hague Convention and Brussels II bis, but the grave risk exception and the child's clear objection to return, combined with the applicant's failure to provide adequate protective arrangements, justify refusal to order the child's return to England and Wales.
Court Disposition
Application for return of child refused
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment