Dooley v. Great Southern Hotels Ltd. [2001] IEHC 115 (27th July, 2001)
The contract permitted termination for good and sufficient reason on six months notice; Plaintiff's conduct constituted good and sufficient reason but instant dismissal was not justified. Defendant breached contract by not giving six months notice, entitling Plaintiff to damages equal to six months gross salary plus limited general damages.
- Citation
- [2001] IEHC 115
- Parties
- Employee: Plaintiff; Employer: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Contract Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff awarded damages for breach of contract.
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Employment, Natural Justice, Notice Period, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Employee
Defendant
Employer
Procedural Posture
Employment Contract Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff's dismissal was justified under the contract
- 2 Whether fair procedures were followed in the dismissal
- 3 Entitlement to damages for breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
The contract permitted termination for good and sufficient reason on six months notice; Plaintiff's conduct constituted good and sufficient reason but instant dismissal was not justified. Defendant breached contract by not giving six months notice, entitling Plaintiff to damages equal to six months gross salary plus limited general damages.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff awarded damages for breach of contract.
Orders
- Decree for £31,752.00 in damages, subject to credit for monies already paid to Plaintiff since termination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment