Competition Authority -v- Beef Industry Development Society Ltd & Anor [2006] IEHC 294 (27 July 2006)
The BIDS arrangements, by their object and effect, constitute an anti-competitive agreement under Article 81(1) EC Treaty, as they involve coordinated output limitation and restrictive covenants among competitors. The arrangements do not satisfy the requirements for exemption under Article 81(3) EC Treaty, as they are not indispensable, do not guarantee a fair share of benefits to consumers, and risk eliminating competition in a substantial part of the market. Accordingly, the arrangements are prohibited and void.
- Citation
- [2006] IEHC 294
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The Competition Authority; First Defendant: Beef Industry Development Society Limited; Second Defendant: Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Summons / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- declarations granted; arrangements prohibited and void
- Legal Topics
- Anti Competitive Agreements, Market Rationalisation, Article 81 EC Treaty, Competition Act 2002, Horizontal Cooperation, Industry Restructuring
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Competition Authority
Plaintiff
Beef Industry Development Society Limited
First Defendant
Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the BIDS arrangements constitute anti-competitive agreements under Article 81(1) EC Treaty and/or Section 4(1) Competition Act 2002
- 2 Whether the arrangements are void and prohibited
- 3 Whether the arrangements qualify for exemption under Article 81(3) EC Treaty and/or Section 4(5) Competition Act 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The BIDS arrangements, by their object and effect, constitute an anti-competitive agreement under Article 81(1) EC Treaty, as they involve coordinated output limitation and restrictive covenants among competitors. The arrangements do not satisfy the requirements for exemption under Article 81(3) EC Treaty, as they are not indispensable, do not guarantee a fair share of benefits to consumers, and risk eliminating competition in a substantial part of the market. Accordingly, the arrangements are prohibited and void.
Court Disposition
declarations granted; arrangements prohibited and void
Orders
- Declaration that each decision forming part of the BIDS arrangements is prohibited and void by virtue of Article 81(1) EC Treaty and/or Section 4(1) Competition Act 2002
- Declaration that the exit agreement is prohibited and void
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment