A. W. K. v The Minister for Justice & Equality & ors [2020] IESC 10 (23 March 2020)
A review decision under s.49(7) of the International Protection Act 2015 is not a separate decision but is absorbed within the original s.49(4)(b) refusal; therefore, it is captured by s.5(1)(oi) of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 and subject to its time limits for judicial review.
- Citation
- [2020] IESC 10
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: A. W. K.; Respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal to Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- International Protection Act 2015, Permission to Remain, Judicial Review Time Limits, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. W. K.
Applicant/appellant
The Minister for Justice and Equality
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal to Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a review decision under s.49(7) of the International Protection Act 2015 is captured by s.5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 for judicial review time limits
- 2 Statutory interpretation of s.49 and s.5 provisions
Ratio Decidendi
A review decision under s.49(7) of the International Protection Act 2015 is not a separate decision but is absorbed within the original s.49(4)(b) refusal; therefore, it is captured by s.5(1)(oi) of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 and subject to its time limits for judicial review.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decision of High Court affirmed
- Proceedings out of time under s.5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment