Delaney v The Personal Injuries Board & Ors (Approved) [2024] IESC 10 (09 April 2024)
The Personal Injuries Guidelines, as adopted and affirmed by the Oireachtas, do not constitute an impermissible delegation of legislative power or infringe judicial independence. The Guidelines are advisory, not binding, and judges retain discretion to depart from them for stated reasons. The legislative framework provides sufficient guidance and boundaries. No property or personal right of the applicant was infringed by the application of the Guidelines to her assessment.
- Citation
- [2024] IESC 10
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Bridget Delaney; Respondent: The Personal Injuries Assessment Board; Respondent: The Judicial Council; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Challenge / Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Guidelines upheld as constitutional
- Legal Topics
- Separation of Powers, Judicial Independence, Delegation of Legislative Power, Personal Injuries Assessment, Damages Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bridget Delaney
Applicant/appellant
The Personal Injuries Assessment Board
Respondent
The Judicial Council
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Challenge / Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Personal Injuries Guidelines adopted by the Judicial Council constitute an impermissible exercise in law-making contrary to Article 15.2.1° of the Constitution
- 2 Whether the Guidelines infringe judicial independence under Article 35.2 of the Constitution
- 3 Whether the legislative framework provides sufficient guidance and boundaries for the delegation of rule-making
Ratio Decidendi
The Personal Injuries Guidelines, as adopted and affirmed by the Oireachtas, do not constitute an impermissible delegation of legislative power or infringe judicial independence. The Guidelines are advisory, not binding, and judges retain discretion to depart from them for stated reasons. The legislative framework provides sufficient guidance and boundaries. No property or personal right of the applicant was infringed by the application of the Guidelines to her assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Guidelines upheld as constitutional
Orders
- The Personal Injuries Guidelines remain in force and must be considered by judges in personal injuries actions.
- Judges retain discretion to depart from the Guidelines for stated reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment