Director of Public Prosecutions -v- Hawkins [2014] IECCA 36 (29 October 2014)
The appeal fails because the prosecution's disclosure was adequate, witness exclusion was not warranted, production orders were valid, admissions were properly admitted, chain of evidence was sufficiently proven, charges were legally founded, and evidence was sufficient for conviction.
- Citation
- [2014] IECCA 36
- Parties
- Prosecutor/respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused/appellant: Carol Hawkins
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Fraud, Disclosure, Production Orders, Chain of Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Witness Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor/respondent
Carol Hawkins
Accused/appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether inadequate disclosure by prosecution rendered the conviction unsafe
- 2 Whether witness exclusion order should have been granted
- 3 Whether production orders for bank evidence were improperly obtained
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal fails because the prosecution's disclosure was adequate, witness exclusion was not warranted, production orders were valid, admissions were properly admitted, chain of evidence was sufficiently proven, charges were legally founded, and evidence was sufficient for conviction.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction affirmed
- no retrial ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment