Callan -v- Boyle Quarries Ltd [2007] IEHC 91 (20 March 2007)

Callan -v- Boyle Quarries Ltd [2007] IEHC 91 (20 March 2007)

The court found that the respondent's quarrying activities since 2003 constituted a significant intensification over historic use, amounting to a material change of use and unauthorised development requiring planning permission. The evidence, including truck movements and aerial photographs, demonstrated that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] IEHC 91
Parties
Applicant: Thomas L. Callan; Respondent: Boyle Quarries Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
20 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Section 160 Planning Injunction Application / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Injunction granted in part; restoration order refused.
Legal Topics
Material Change of Use, Intensification of Use, Planning Permission, Exempted Development, Quarry Operations, Environmental Impact, Section 160 Injunctions
Planning Law Administrative Law Material Change of Use Intensification of Use Planning Permission Exempted Development Quarry Operations Environmental Impact +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas L. Callan

Applicant

Boyle Quarries Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Section 160 Planning Injunction Application / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the intensification of quarrying activities constituted a material change of use requiring planning permission
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's activities exceeded established use and were unauthorised development
  3. 3 Whether the applicant was entitled to injunctive relief under s.160 of the Planning and Development Act, 2000

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's quarrying activities since 2003 constituted a significant intensification over historic use, amounting to a material change of use and unauthorised development requiring planning permission. The evidence, including truck movements and aerial photographs, demonstrated that the current use exceeded the established use on the appointed day. The court exercised its discretion to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from exceeding 80,000 tons per year or 16 loads per day or 2 per hour.

Court Disposition

Injunction granted in part; restoration order refused.

Orders

  • Order restraining the respondent from carrying out quarrying activities at Letfordspark, Lugnamuddagh or Castlefilogue, Co. Roscommon in excess of 80,000 tons per year or in excess of 16 loads per day or 2 per hour.
  • Order refusing to require restoration of the lands to pre-intensification or March 2002 condition.