Talbot -v- Hermotage Golf Club & Ors [2012] IEHC 372 (27 July 2012)
The words 'Handicap Building' were defamatory in their natural and ordinary meaning, imputing cheating at golf. However, publication to Genesys employees occurred on an occasion of qualified privilege, and the plaintiff failed to prove malice or improper motive. No actionable libel was established against the defendants.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 372
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Thomas Talbot; Defendant: Hermitage Golf Club; Defendant: Golfing Union of Ireland; Defendant: Eddie Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Defamation / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Qualified Privilege, Malice, Publication, Handicap Adjustment, Club Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Talbot
Plaintiff
Hermitage Golf Club
Defendant
Golfing Union of Ireland
Defendant
Eddie Murphy
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the words 'Handicap Building' were defamatory of the plaintiff
- 2 Whether publication of defamatory words occurred to third parties
- 3 Whether publication was protected by qualified privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The words 'Handicap Building' were defamatory in their natural and ordinary meaning, imputing cheating at golf. However, publication to Genesys employees occurred on an occasion of qualified privilege, and the plaintiff failed to prove malice or improper motive. No actionable libel was established against the defendants.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Orders
- No damages awarded
- No injunction granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment