L0C8 Code Limited v The Department of Environment Climate and Communications & Ors (Approved) [2024] IECA 235 (30 September 2024)

L0C8 Code Limited v The Department of Environment Climate and Communications & Ors (Approved) [2024] IECA 235 (30 September 2024)

The substance of the appellant's claim was a challenge to the public procurement process and contract award, which was manifestly out of time under the relevant regulations. The action could not be saved by amendment as its core was impermissible and statute-barred.

Citation
[2024] IECA 235
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: LOC8 CODE LIMITED; Defendant/respondent: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE SUPPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS; Defendant/respondent: CAPITA BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES IRELAND LIMITED; Defendant/respondent: AN POST
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
30 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Striking Out Proceedings
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Time Limits for Procurement Challenges, Conspiracy, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review, Pleadings and Amendments
Public Procurement Administrative Law Competition Law Time Limits for Procurement Challenges Conspiracy Statutory Interpretation Judicial Review Pleadings and Amendments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LOC8 CODE LIMITED

Plaintiff/appellant

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE SUPPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS

Defendant/respondent

CAPITA BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES IRELAND LIMITED

Defendant/respondent

AN POST

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Striking Out Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's claim was in substance a public procurement claim and thus out of time
  2. 2 Whether the High Court erred in striking out the proceedings without permitting amendment of pleadings
  3. 3 Whether the claim for conspiracy could survive independently of procurement law time limits

Ratio Decidendi

The substance of the appellant's claim was a challenge to the public procurement process and contract award, which was manifestly out of time under the relevant regulations. The action could not be saved by amendment as its core was impermissible and statute-barred.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed and High Court order affirmed.
  • Respondents presumptively entitled to costs of the appeal, subject to written submissions on costs within 14 days.