Wallace -v- Creevey & ors [2016] IEHC 294 (01 June 2016)
The plaintiff's claim against the State defendants is manifestly statute barred as the limitation period expired long before proceedings were issued, and neither psychological disability nor a change in law postpones the limitation period. The claim is also bound to fail as a matter of law, as no cause of action arises under the ECHR or the 2003 Act for events predating its commencement, and claims in negligence or vicarious liability against the State defendants are unsustainable under existing Irish law.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 294
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Timothy Wallace; Defendant: Gary Creevey; Defendant: John Kevin Mullan; Defendant: The Board of Management North Monastery Primary School; Defendant: Edmund Rice Schools Trust Limited; Defendant: John Buckley; Defendant: The Minister for Education; Defendant: Ireland; Defendant: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Claim (sexual Abuse, Negligence, Breach of Duty) / Application by State Defendants to Set Aside Joinder and Strike Out Claim as Statute Barred And/or Disclosing No Reasonable Cause of Action
- Outcome
- Order joining the State defendants set aside; plaintiff's claim against the State defendants struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Statute of Limitations, Sexual Abuse, Vicarious Liability, Negligence, European Convention on Human Rights, Retrospectivity of Legislation, Procedural Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Wallace
Plaintiff
Gary Creevey
Defendant
John Kevin Mullan
Defendant
The Board of Management North Monastery Primary School
Defendant
Edmund Rice Schools Trust Limited
Defendant
John Buckley
Defendant
The Minister for Education
Defendant
Ireland
Defendant
The Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Claim (sexual Abuse, Negligence, Breach of Duty) / Application by State Defendants to Set Aside Joinder and Strike Out Claim as Statute Barred And/or Disclosing No Reasonable Cause of Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's claim against the State defendants is statute barred
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's claim discloses a reasonable cause of action against the State defendants
- 3 Whether a change in law (ECtHR decision in O'Keeffe v Ireland) can postpone the limitation period under the Statute of Limitations
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's claim against the State defendants is manifestly statute barred as the limitation period expired long before proceedings were issued, and neither psychological disability nor a change in law postpones the limitation period. The claim is also bound to fail as a matter of law, as no cause of action arises under the ECHR or the 2003 Act for events predating its commencement, and claims in negligence or vicarious liability against the State defendants are unsustainable under existing Irish law.
Court Disposition
Order joining the State defendants set aside; plaintiff's claim against the State defendants struck out.
Orders
- Order of the Master of 20 January 2015 joining the State defendants is set aside.
- Plaintiff's claim as against the State defendants is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment