O'Riain & Anor v Trade Marks Act 1996 & Anor (Approved) [2021] IEHC 278 (23 April 2021)
Savanagh, as a party to proceedings commenced by special summons, is entitled to serve notice to cross-examine the applicants' deponent, and the applicants have not discharged the onus of proof to show that cross-examination ought not to be permitted.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 278
- Parties
- Applicant: Tomás Ó Riain; Applicant: Seosamh Ó Baoill; First Notice Party: Controller of Patents Designs and Trade Marks; Second Notice Party: Savanagh Securities Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Cross Examination
- Outcome
- Motion granted
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Rectification, Cross Examination Rights, Legal Capacity of Unincorporated Associations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tomás Ó Riain
Applicant
Seosamh Ó Baoill
Applicant
Controller of Patents Designs and Trade Marks
First Notice Party
Savanagh Securities Limited
Second Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Special Summons / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Cross Examination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Savanagh Securities Limited is entitled to cross-examine Seosamh Ó Baoill on his affidavit in special summons proceedings
- 2 Whether the applicants have established grounds to prevent cross-examination as an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
Savanagh, as a party to proceedings commenced by special summons, is entitled to serve notice to cross-examine the applicants' deponent, and the applicants have not discharged the onus of proof to show that cross-examination ought not to be permitted.
Court Disposition
Motion granted
Orders
- Declaration that Savanagh Securities Limited is entitled to serve notice for production of Seosamh Ó Baoill for cross-examination on his affidavit filed 10 May 2019.
- Declaration that applicants have failed to establish grounds to prevent cross-examination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment