Red Sail Frozen Foods Ltd ( In Receivership) -v- Companies Act [2006] IEHC 328 (20 October 2006)
It is lawful for the receiver to pay the preferential claims for arrears of wages, holiday pay, minimum notice, and unfair dismissal, including those subrogated to the Minister, notwithstanding the pre-receivership illegality, due to statutory intervention and the pragmatic approach of the Department. The receiver is entitled to remuneration and reimbursement of costs and expenses as claimed, subject to the court's discretion under s. 24(6) of the Conveyancing Act, 1881, as applied by the debentures. The bank is not entitled to reimbursement for all legal costs out of the assets of the companies, only those properly incurred in enforcing or preserving its security.
- Citation
- [2006] IEHC 328
- Parties
- Applicant: Tom Grace, Receiver; Company: Red Sail Frozen Foods Limited (In Receivership); Company: Red Sail Kilmore Limited (In Receivership); Company: Red Sail Exports Limited (In Receivership); Secured Creditor: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited; Notice Party/claimant: Minister of Enterprise, Trade and Employment; Notice Party: Revenue Commissioners; Notice Parties/claimants: Employees of Frozen Foods and Kilmore
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Directions Under Companies Act / High Court Judgment on Application for Directions
- Outcome
- Application for directions granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Receivership, Preferential Claims, Illegality of Contracts, Remuneration of Receivers, Subrogation, Priority of Payments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tom Grace, Receiver
Applicant
Red Sail Frozen Foods Limited (In Receivership)
Company
Red Sail Kilmore Limited (In Receivership)
Company
Red Sail Exports Limited (In Receivership)
Company
Ulster Bank Ireland Limited
Secured Creditor
Minister of Enterprise, Trade and Employment
Notice Party/claimant
Revenue Commissioners
Notice Party
Employees of Frozen Foods and Kilmore
Notice Parties/claimants
Procedural Posture
Application for Directions Under Companies Act / High Court Judgment on Application for Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the receiver can lawfully pay preferential claims for arrears of wages, holiday pay, minimum notice, and unfair dismissal where there was a pre-receivership practice of untaxed 'under the counter' payments to employees; Whether the receiver is entitled to remuneration and reimbursement of costs and expenses, and how these should be quantified; Whether the bank is entitled to be paid out of the assets of the companies for legal costs and expenses incurred in connection with the receivership and related litigation.
Ratio Decidendi
It is lawful for the receiver to pay the preferential claims for arrears of wages, holiday pay, minimum notice, and unfair dismissal, including those subrogated to the Minister, notwithstanding the pre-receivership illegality, due to statutory intervention and the pragmatic approach of the Department. The receiver is entitled to remuneration and reimbursement of costs and expenses as claimed, subject to the court's discretion under s. 24(6) of the Conveyancing Act, 1881, as applied by the debentures. The bank is not entitled to reimbursement for all legal costs out of the assets of the companies, only those properly incurred in enforcing or preserving its security.
Court Disposition
Application for directions granted in part.
Orders
- It is lawful for the receiver to pay the preferential claims of the Minister and employees for arrears of wages, holiday pay, minimum notice, and unfair dismissal.
- The receiver is entitled to remuneration and reimbursement of costs and expenses as claimed, subject to the court's discretion under s. 24(6) of the Conveyancing Act, 1881.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment