W. and R. Murrough (in recievership) -v- Companies Acts [2011] IEHC 163 (21 March 2011)
In the absence of evidence as to the date of wrongful sale, the most equitable method of valuation is to use the mode (most frequently occurring value) of the share prices between acquisition and receivership, ensuring fairness among all claimants and avoiding overcompensation or undercompensation.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 163
- Parties
- Applicant: Tom Grace; Respondent: James Sheehan; Respondent: Hugh Hall; Respondent: Barbara Hall
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Receivership Application / Judgment on Directions for Valuation of Shares
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; directions given for valuation of shares based on mode value.
- Legal Topics
- Receivership, Wrongful Sale of Shares, Damages for Conversion, Valuation of Assets, Distribution of Client Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tom Grace
Applicant
James Sheehan
Respondent
Hugh Hall
Respondent
Barbara Hall
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Receivership Application / Judgment on Directions for Valuation of Shares
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate method for valuing shares wrongfully sold without client authorisation in a receivership?
- 2 Should the highest, mean, median, or mode value of shares during the relevant period be used for compensation?
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of evidence as to the date of wrongful sale, the most equitable method of valuation is to use the mode (most frequently occurring value) of the share prices between acquisition and receivership, ensuring fairness among all claimants and avoiding overcompensation or undercompensation.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; directions given for valuation of shares based on mode value.
Orders
- Valuation of shares for compensation purposes to be based on the mode of share prices between acquisition and receivership.
- Liberty to apply granted for further directions on implementation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment