Kavanagh v. O'Donoghue & Anor [2003] IEHC 129 (14 November 2003)
The portions of the s.56 report relating to questions 22 and 31 are relevant and necessary for the fair disposal of the s.150 application and for saving costs. Section 17(1) of the Act of 2001 does not preclude discovery, as disclosure is permitted 'in accordance with law.'
- Citation
- [2003] IEHC 129
- Parties
- Applicant: Tom Kavanagh; Respondent: Donal O'Donoghue; Respondent: Mary O'Donoghue
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Discovery in Company Liquidation Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
- Outcome
- Order for discovery granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Liquidation, Restriction of Directors, Confidentiality of Reports
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tom Kavanagh
Applicant
Donal O'Donoghue
Respondent
Mary O'Donoghue
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Discovery in Company Liquidation Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the s.56 report of the liquidator to the Director of Corporate Enforcement is discoverable in s.150 proceedings for restriction of directors
- 2 Whether confidentiality or statutory provisions preclude discovery of the report
Ratio Decidendi
The portions of the s.56 report relating to questions 22 and 31 are relevant and necessary for the fair disposal of the s.150 application and for saving costs. Section 17(1) of the Act of 2001 does not preclude discovery, as disclosure is permitted 'in accordance with law.'
Court Disposition
Order for discovery granted in part
Orders
- Respondents are entitled to discovery of the portions of the applicant's s.56 report relating to answers to questions 22 and 31, including any appendices or separate sheets containing those answers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment