A.K. v U.S. (Unapproved) [2022] IECA 65 (16 March 2022)

A.K. v U.S. (Unapproved) [2022] IECA 65 (16 March 2022)

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's findings that A and B were habitually resident in England and C was habitually resident in Ireland as of August 2021. The determination was based on the factual integration of the children into their respective environments, the intentions and actions of the parents, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] IECA 65
Parties
Applicant/appellant: A. K.; Respondent: U. S.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
16 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction (hague Convention) / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court findings affirmed.
Legal Topics
Habitual Residence, Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Custody, Separation of Siblings
Family Law International Law Habitual Residence Child Abduction Hague Convention Custody Separation of Siblings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A. K.

Applicant/appellant

U. S.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Child Abduction (hague Convention) / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in deciding that C was habitually resident in Ireland
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in deciding that A and B were habitually resident in England
  3. 3 Whether the judge erred in refusing to direct the return of A and B to the United Kingdom on the basis that their separation from C would be intolerable

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's findings that A and B were habitually resident in England and C was habitually resident in Ireland as of August 2021. The determination was based on the factual integration of the children into their respective environments, the intentions and actions of the parents, and the children's connections to each jurisdiction. The court found no material error in the trial judge's evaluation of the evidence and application of the legal principles governing habitual residence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court findings affirmed.

Orders

  • No order for return of any of the children under Article 12 of the Hague Convention
  • Children not to be separated; refusal to return A and B due to intolerable situation of separation from C