In the Matter of U.S Ltd -v- Companies Acts 1963 to 2009 [2012] IEHC 600 (29 November 2012)
The respondent company is unable to pay its debts as required by statute, the settlement agreement is binding, and no substantial grounds exist for the respondent's claims for credit/set-off due to lack of returns, vouching documentation, and statutory time bar. Revenue acted lawfully and fairly. Winding up is just and equitable.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 600
- Parties
- Petitioner: Gerard Harrahil, Collector General; Respondent: U. S. Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Corporate Insolvency, Tax Compliance, Statutory Demand, Settlement Agreement, Statute of Limitations, C2 Certificate, Credit Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerard Harrahil, Collector General
Petitioner
U. S. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether U. S. Ltd is unable to pay its debts under s. 214 of the Companies Act 1963 as substituted by s. 123 of the Companies Act 1990
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement dated 16 January 2009 is binding
- 3 Whether the respondent's claim for credit/set-off is valid and not statute barred
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent company is unable to pay its debts as required by statute, the settlement agreement is binding, and no substantial grounds exist for the respondent's claims for credit/set-off due to lack of returns, vouching documentation, and statutory time bar. Revenue acted lawfully and fairly. Winding up is just and equitable.
Court Disposition
petition granted
Orders
- Order winding up U. S. Ltd
- Appointment of Jonathon Byrne, Certified Accountant, as Liquidator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment