D.P.P. v. McCormack [1999] IEHC 13; [1999] 4 IR 158; [2000] 1 ILRM 241 (8th July, 1999)

D.P.P. v. McCormack [1999] IEHC 13; [1999] 4 IR 158; [2000] 1 ILRM 241 (8th July, 1999)

The accused was not validly arrested because the arresting Garda did not use a form of words indicating to the accused that he was under restraint; this lack of valid arrest vitiated subsequent procedures, and the charge was properly dismissed.

Citation
[1999] IEHC 13
Parties
Prosecutor/appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused/respondent: Michael McCormack
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment
Outcome
charge dismissed
Legal Topics
Validity of Arrest, Requirement to Inform Accused of Arrest, Road Traffic Offences, Procedure for Arrest Without Warrant

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor/appellant

Michael McCormack

Accused/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether failure to inform accused of arrest and reason for arrest invalidates subsequent procedures
  2. 2 Whether technical or layman's language is required to communicate reason for arrest
  3. 3 Whether a form of words indicating restraint is necessary for a valid arrest

Ratio Decidendi

The accused was not validly arrested because the arresting Garda did not use a form of words indicating to the accused that he was under restraint; this lack of valid arrest vitiated subsequent procedures, and the charge was properly dismissed.

Court Disposition

charge dismissed

Orders

  • The charge against the accused is dismissed due to invalid arrest.