D.P.P. v. McCormack [1999] IEHC 13; [1999] 4 IR 158; [2000] 1 ILRM 241 (8th July, 1999)
The accused was not validly arrested because the arresting Garda did not use a form of words indicating to the accused that he was under restraint; this lack of valid arrest vitiated subsequent procedures, and the charge was properly dismissed.
- Citation
- [1999] IEHC 13
- Parties
- Prosecutor/appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused/respondent: Michael McCormack
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- charge dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Arrest, Requirement to Inform Accused of Arrest, Road Traffic Offences, Procedure for Arrest Without Warrant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor/appellant
Michael McCormack
Accused/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to inform accused of arrest and reason for arrest invalidates subsequent procedures
- 2 Whether technical or layman's language is required to communicate reason for arrest
- 3 Whether a form of words indicating restraint is necessary for a valid arrest
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was not validly arrested because the arresting Garda did not use a form of words indicating to the accused that he was under restraint; this lack of valid arrest vitiated subsequent procedures, and the charge was properly dismissed.
Court Disposition
charge dismissed
Orders
- The charge against the accused is dismissed due to invalid arrest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment