Case study 8: Veterinary practice discloses dog owner's personal data [2011] IEDPC 8 (2011)

Case study 8: Veterinary practice discloses dog owner's personal data [2011] IEDPC 8 (2011)

The veterinary practice had no justification for disclosing the new owner's name and address; the disclosure was avoidable and constituted a breach of data protection obligations, despite the practice acting in good faith.

Citation
[2011] IEDPC 8
Parties
Complainant: Complainant (Dog's new owner); Respondent: Veterinary Practice
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Data Protection Complaint / Decision After Investigation
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Personal Data, Veterinary Records, Microchip Database, Data Controller Responsibilities
Data Protection Disclosure of Personal Data Veterinary Records Microchip Database Data Controller Responsibilities

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Complainant (Dog's new owner)

Complainant

Veterinary Practice

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Data Protection Complaint / Decision After Investigation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the veterinary practice unlawfully disclosed the complainant's personal data to a third party

Ratio Decidendi

The veterinary practice had no justification for disclosing the new owner's name and address; the disclosure was avoidable and constituted a breach of data protection obligations, despite the practice acting in good faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • Veterinary practice reminded of data protection obligations
  • Staff at the practice made aware of the need for protection of personal data