Viera Ltd -v- Revenue Commissioners [2009] IEHC 431 (06 October 2009)
The Revenue Commissioners had sufficient material to form a reasonable belief that tax was due when raising the assessments in December 2006. The assessments were for two separate periods, not a single assessment. The assessment for the period 1 September 2003 to 31 August 2004 was within time and valid; the earlier period's assessment was out of time but the applicant delayed unreasonably in raising this ground.
- Citation
- [2009] IEHC 431
- Parties
- Applicant: Viera Limited; Respondents: The Revenue Commissioners
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Reliefs refused
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Tax Assessment, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation, Limitation Periods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Viera Limited
Applicant
The Revenue Commissioners
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Revenue Commissioners had 'reason to believe' tax was due under s.23 of the Value Added Tax Act 1972 when raising the assessment.
- 2 Whether the assessment issued on 14 December 2006 was a single assessment or two separate assessments for different periods.
- 3 Whether the assessment (or part thereof) was out of time under s.30(4)(a)(ii) of the Value Added Tax Act 1972.
Ratio Decidendi
The Revenue Commissioners had sufficient material to form a reasonable belief that tax was due when raising the assessments in December 2006. The assessments were for two separate periods, not a single assessment. The assessment for the period 1 September 2003 to 31 August 2004 was within time and valid; the earlier period's assessment was out of time but the applicant delayed unreasonably in raising this ground.
Court Disposition
Reliefs refused
Orders
- Application for judicial review refused
- No relief granted to applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment