Keaney v Sullivan & Ors [2007] IEHC 8 (16 January 2007)
Claims of fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and undue influence are not sufficiently particularised and must be struck out; plaintiff cannot pursue derivative actions or rectification of share register after share transfer; claims for breach of fiduciary duty by directors to shareholders are unsustainable absent special circumstances; only certain breach of contract and negligence claims survive.
- Citation
- [2007] IEHC 8
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Vincent Keaney; First Defendant: James Sullivan; Second Defendant: Joan Sullivan; Third Defendant: St. John Culligan; Fourth Defendant: Michael Nolan; Fifth Defendant: Titanic Queenstown Trading Company Limited (in liquidation); Sixth Defendant: Magpie International Holding Company Limited (in liquidation); Seventh Defendant: Titanic Queenstown Memorabila Limited (in liquidation); Eighth Defendant: Allied Irish Banks PLC; Ninth Defendant: Q. E. F. Global Limited; Tenth Defendant: Roger Duncan; Eleventh Defendant: Geoffrey Lewis; Twelfth Defendant: David Marsh; Thirteenth Defendant: Tom Moore; Fourteenth Defendant: Declan O’Luanaigh; Fifteenth Defendant: Neil Payne; Sixteenth Defendant: David Isaacson (carrying on practice under the style and title of Ormsby Rhodes and BKR Ormsby Rhodes); Seventeenth Defendant: Tregan Properties Limited; Eighteenth Defendant: Julia Nolan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Summons / Ruling on Motions to Strike Out Pleadings
- Outcome
- Majority of plaintiff's claims struck out; only limited breach of contract and negligence claims survive against certain defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Pleading Requirements, Fraud and Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Corporate Veil, Derivative Actions, Rectification of Share Register, Rule in Foss V. Harbottle, Director Duties, Stamp Duty, Share Transfers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vincent Keaney
Plaintiff
James Sullivan
First Defendant
Joan Sullivan
Second Defendant
St. John Culligan
Third Defendant
Michael Nolan
Fourth Defendant
Titanic Queenstown Trading Company Limited (in liquidation)
Fifth Defendant
Magpie International Holding Company Limited (in liquidation)
Sixth Defendant
Titanic Queenstown Memorabila Limited (in liquidation)
Seventh Defendant
Allied Irish Banks PLC
Eighth Defendant
Q. E. F. Global Limited
Ninth Defendant
Roger Duncan
Tenth Defendant
Geoffrey Lewis
Eleventh Defendant
David Marsh
Twelfth Defendant
Tom Moore
Thirteenth Defendant
Declan O’Luanaigh
Fourteenth Defendant
Neil Payne
Fifteenth Defendant
David Isaacson (carrying on practice under the style and title of Ormsby Rhodes and BKR Ormsby Rhodes)
Sixteenth Defendant
Tregan Properties Limited
Seventeenth Defendant
Julia Nolan
Eighteenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / Ruling on Motions to Strike Out Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff's claims of fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and undue influence are sufficiently particularised under O. 19, r. 5(2)
- 2 Whether claims disclose reasonable causes of action or are frivolous/vexatious/unsustainable
- 3 Application of rule in Foss v. Harbottle to shareholder claims
Ratio Decidendi
Claims of fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and undue influence are not sufficiently particularised and must be struck out; plaintiff cannot pursue derivative actions or rectification of share register after share transfer; claims for breach of fiduciary duty by directors to shareholders are unsustainable absent special circumstances; only certain breach of contract and negligence claims survive.
Court Disposition
Majority of plaintiff's claims struck out; only limited breach of contract and negligence claims survive against certain defendants.
Orders
- All claims against third defendant struck out.
- All claims against fourth defendant struck out except breach of contract (Pollyexfen Design Limited debts), deed of assignment (Scotts Buildings), and breach of contract (Tregan Building) subject to amendment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment