Harvey -v- Minister for Jobs Enterprise and Innovation & ors [2018] IEHC 479 (07 August 2018)
The proceedings were struck out because they disclosed no cause of action, were frivolous and vexatious, unnecessary and scandalous, and constituted an abuse of court process. The pleadings were incoherent, lacked factual basis, and failed to meet the standards required for liability or for recovery of damages.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 479
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Walter Harvey; Defendants: Minister for Jobs Enterprise and Innovation and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Summons / Application to Dismiss Proceedings
- Outcome
- proceedings struck out
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Frivolous and Vexatious Proceedings, Fair Procedures, Wrongful Dismissal, Judicial Review, Statutory Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walter Harvey
Plaintiff
Minister for Jobs Enterprise and Innovation and Others
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / Application to Dismiss Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings disclose a cause of action
- 2 Whether the proceedings are frivolous and vexatious
- 3 Whether the proceedings are unnecessary and scandalous
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were struck out because they disclosed no cause of action, were frivolous and vexatious, unnecessary and scandalous, and constituted an abuse of court process. The pleadings were incoherent, lacked factual basis, and failed to meet the standards required for liability or for recovery of damages.
Court Disposition
proceedings struck out
Orders
- Proceedings struck out on grounds of abuse of court process, no cause of action, frivolous and vexatious, unnecessary and scandalous.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment