Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. & Ors v. Warner-Lambert Co. [2005] IEHC 178 (8 June 2005)
Documents comprising representations by the patentee or its agents, whether made to foreign patent offices or internally, are inadmissible for the purpose of construing the Irish patent, as they reflect subjective intentions or interpretations, which are irrelevant to the objective legal construction of the patent claims. The principle of admissions against interest does not apply in this context.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 178
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy Europe Limited and Ranbaxy Ireland Limited; Defendant: Warner-Lambert Company
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial List / Patent Dispute / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Documents for Discovery
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Patent Construction, Admissibility of Evidence, Discovery, Interpretation of Patent Claims, Statements Against Interest, Foreign Patent Prosecution History
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy Europe Limited and Ranbaxy Ireland Limited
Plaintiffs
Warner-Lambert Company
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial List / Patent Dispute / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Documents for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents evidencing patentee's representations to foreign patent offices and internal memoranda are admissible in evidence for the purpose of construing the Irish patent
- 2 Whether such documents are admissible as statements against interest
Ratio Decidendi
Documents comprising representations by the patentee or its agents, whether made to foreign patent offices or internally, are inadmissible for the purpose of construing the Irish patent, as they reflect subjective intentions or interpretations, which are irrelevant to the objective legal construction of the patent claims. The principle of admissions against interest does not apply in this context.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Documents sought by the plaintiffs are inadmissible for the purpose of construing the patent and are not to be discovered on that basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment