Murray -v- Trustees & Admin of the Irish Airlines [Gen Employee] Superannuation Scheme [2007] IEHC 27 (25 January 2007)
A party who has availed of the Pensions Ombudsman process is limited to the statutory appeal under s.140 of the Pensions Act 1990 and may not seek additional substantive declaratory relief in the High Court; the appeal is to be determined on the material before the Ombudsman, and new evidence will only be admitted in exceptional circumstances, which are not present here.
- Citation
- [2007] IEHC 27
- Parties
- Plaintiff: William James Murray; Defendants: The Trustees and Administrators of the Irish Airlines (General Employees) Superannuation Scheme; Notice Party: The Pensions Ombudsman
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons / Statutory Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Scope of Appeal and Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for additional declaratory relief and to adduce new expert evidence refused; appeal to proceed on statutory grounds only and on the material before the Ombudsman.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Appeals, Res Judicata, Admissibility of Evidence, Interpretation of Pension Scheme Rules, Jurisdiction of Ombudsman
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William James Murray
Plaintiff
The Trustees and Administrators of the Irish Airlines (General Employees) Superannuation Scheme
Defendants
The Pensions Ombudsman
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Special Summons / Statutory Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Scope of Appeal and Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a party who has availed of the Pensions Ombudsman process may also seek substantive declaratory relief in the High Court beyond the statutory appeal under s.140 of the Pensions Act 1990
- 2 Whether the appellant may adduce new expert evidence on appeal to the High Court that was not before the Ombudsman
Ratio Decidendi
A party who has availed of the Pensions Ombudsman process is limited to the statutory appeal under s.140 of the Pensions Act 1990 and may not seek additional substantive declaratory relief in the High Court; the appeal is to be determined on the material before the Ombudsman, and new evidence will only be admitted in exceptional circumstances, which are not present here.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for additional declaratory relief and to adduce new expert evidence refused; appeal to proceed on statutory grounds only and on the material before the Ombudsman.
Orders
- Plaintiff limited to prosecuting the statutory appeal under s.140 of the Pensions Act 1990.
- Plaintiff not permitted to adduce new expert evidence (actuary's report) on the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment