Jones -v- Coolmore Stud [2016] IEHC 329 (14 June 2016)

Jones -v- Coolmore Stud [2016] IEHC 329 (14 June 2016)

The plaintiff failed to establish an arguable cause of action for interlocutory or mandatory injunctions. The defendant's conduct in notifying retailers of alleged defamatory content was legitimate and did not constitute an actionable wrong. The plaintiff breached the confidentiality agreement and infringed copyright, precluding equitable relief. Damages are an adequate remedy for any loss suffered.

Citation
[2016] IEHC 329
Parties
Plaintiff: William Jones; Defendant: Coolmore Stud
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
14 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / Application for Interlocutory Injunctions
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Breach of Confidentiality Agreement, Defamation, Copyright Infringement, Equitable Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Jones

Plaintiff

Coolmore Stud

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Plenary Summons / Application for Interlocutory Injunctions

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's letters to booksellers constitute actionable wrongs
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to interlocutory or mandatory injunctions
  3. 3 Whether damages are an adequate remedy

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to establish an arguable cause of action for interlocutory or mandatory injunctions. The defendant's conduct in notifying retailers of alleged defamatory content was legitimate and did not constitute an actionable wrong. The plaintiff breached the confidentiality agreement and infringed copyright, precluding equitable relief. Damages are an adequate remedy for any loss suffered.

Court Disposition

Application refused