Window and Roofing Concepts Ltd. v. Tolmac Construction Ltd. [2003] IEHC 108 (11 December 2003)

Window and Roofing Concepts Ltd. v. Tolmac Construction Ltd. [2003] IEHC 108 (11 December 2003)

In the absence of any prejudice to the defendants and given the public interest in avoiding unnecessary costs and litigation, the court exercises its discretion to grant an extension of time for the plaintiff to accept the lodgment.

Citation
[2003] IEHC 108
Parties
Plaintiff: Window and Roofing Concepts Limited; Defendant: Tolmac Construction Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
11 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Master's Refusal of Extension of Time to Accept Lodgment
Outcome
Extension of time granted for plaintiff to accept lodgment.
Legal Topics
Lodgment, Extension of Time, Costs, Discretion of Court
Civil Procedure Lodgment Extension of Time Costs Discretion of Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Window and Roofing Concepts Limited

Plaintiff

Tolmac Construction Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Master's Refusal of Extension of Time to Accept Lodgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the court grant an extension of time for the plaintiff to accept a lodgment made by the defendant after the expiry of the prescribed period?
  2. 2 Is the defendant's refusal to consent to late acceptance of the lodgment reasonable?
  3. 3 What are the cost consequences of granting an extension of time to accept a lodgment?

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of any prejudice to the defendants and given the public interest in avoiding unnecessary costs and litigation, the court exercises its discretion to grant an extension of time for the plaintiff to accept the lodgment.

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted for plaintiff to accept lodgment.

Orders

  • Plaintiff entitled to costs up to 20 February 2003.
  • Defendant entitled to costs from 20 February 2003 to 30 May 2003.