Winthrop Engineering Ltd -v- David Flynn Ltd [2012] IEHC 345 (31 July 2012)
The defendant has established a real or bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claim, particularly regarding the contingency of payment on receipt of funds from the developer and the factual dispute over the six-month right to sue, making summary judgment inappropriate and requiring a plenary hearing.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 345
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Winthrop Engineering Limited; Defendant: David Flynn Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/contract Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment refused; matter adjourned to plenary hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Building Contracts, Payment Obligations, Defences to Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Winthrop Engineering Limited
Plaintiff
David Flynn Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial/contract Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has a real or bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claim for payment under an agreement
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted or the matter should proceed to plenary hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant has established a real or bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claim, particularly regarding the contingency of payment on receipt of funds from the developer and the factual dispute over the six-month right to sue, making summary judgment inappropriate and requiring a plenary hearing.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment refused; matter adjourned to plenary hearing.
Orders
- Relief sought in the notice of motion refused
- Application adjourned to plenary hearing in accordance with Order 37 RSC
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment