Harvey -v- The Courts Service & ors [2015] IEHC 680 (05 November 2015)
Plaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal at common law is barred by s.15(2) of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 as he commenced proceedings before the EAT; the statement of claim does not disclose a reasonable cause of action and is frivolous or vexatious; claims for assault and defamation are not properly pleaded or particularised and cannot be pursued.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 680
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Walter John Harvey; Defendant/applicant: The Courts Service; Defendant/applicant: John Glennon; Defendant/applicant: Margaret O’Rafferty; Defendant/applicant: Emer Darcy; Defendant/applicant: David O’Shea; Defendant/applicant: Eugene Lynch; Defendant/applicant: P. J. Fitzpatrick
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Action / Application to Strike Out Claim
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims struck out
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Strike Out Applications, Personal Injuries, Defamation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walter John Harvey
Plaintiff/respondent
The Courts Service
Defendant/applicant
John Glennon
Defendant/applicant
Margaret O’Rafferty
Defendant/applicant
Emer Darcy
Defendant/applicant
David O’Shea
Defendant/applicant
Eugene Lynch
Defendant/applicant
P. J. Fitzpatrick
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Action / Application to Strike Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal at common law is barred by s.15(2) of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977
- 2 Whether the statement of claim discloses a reasonable cause of action or is frivolous or vexatious
- 3 Whether claims for assault and defamation can be pursued in these proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal at common law is barred by s.15(2) of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 as he commenced proceedings before the EAT; the statement of claim does not disclose a reasonable cause of action and is frivolous or vexatious; claims for assault and defamation are not properly pleaded or particularised and cannot be pursued.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims struck out
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim as against the defendants is struck out pursuant to s.15(2) of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977
- Plaintiff's claim struck out pursuant to Order 19 Rule 28 of the Rules of the Superior Courts
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment