X.C. v Y.C. (Approved) [2023] IEHC 671 (22 November 2023)

X.C. v Y.C. (Approved) [2023] IEHC 671 (22 November 2023)

The respondent is under a mandatory obligation to file and serve an affidavit of means in cohabitation proceedings under Part 15 of the 2010 Act and associated rules; the court has no jurisdiction to waive or defer this obligation based on privacy concerns or the respondent's wealth. The application for a modular...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] IEHC 671
Parties
Applicant: X. C.; Respondent: Y. C.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Cohabitation Special Summons / Interlocutory Motions Regarding Affidavit of Means and Modular Trial
Outcome
Respondent's applications to waive affidavit of means and for modular trial refused; applicant's application to compel affidavit of means granted.
Legal Topics
Cohabitant Rights, Affidavit of Means, Disclosure Obligations, Modular Trial, Privacy in Litigation
Family Law Civil Procedure Cohabitant Rights Affidavit of Means Disclosure Obligations Modular Trial Privacy in Litigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

X. C.

Applicant

Y. C.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cohabitation Special Summons / Interlocutory Motions Regarding Affidavit of Means and Modular Trial

  1. 1 Whether respondent is obliged to file and serve an affidavit of means under Part 15 of the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010 and associated rules
  2. 2 Whether a modular trial should be ordered to determine preliminary issues before financial disclosure
  3. 3 Whether respondent's privacy concerns justify waiving or deferring disclosure obligations

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent is under a mandatory obligation to file and serve an affidavit of means in cohabitation proceedings under Part 15 of the 2010 Act and associated rules; the court has no jurisdiction to waive or defer this obligation based on privacy concerns or the respondent's wealth. The application for a modular trial is refused as insufficient evidence was provided to justify departure from a unitary trial, and such modularisation would disproportionately prejudice the applicant.

Court Disposition

Respondent's applications to waive affidavit of means and for modular trial refused; applicant's application to compel affidavit of means granted.

Orders

  • Order compelling respondent to serve an affidavit of means pursuant to O.70B, r.5(4) of the Rules of the Superior Courts.
  • Matter listed for hearing on time period for compliance and costs.