X.C. v Y.C. (Approved) [2023] IEHC 671 (22 November 2023)
The respondent is under a mandatory obligation to file and serve an affidavit of means in cohabitation proceedings under Part 15 of the 2010 Act and associated rules; the court has no jurisdiction to waive or defer this obligation based on privacy concerns or the respondent's wealth. The application for a modular...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] IEHC 671
- Parties
- Applicant: X. C.; Respondent: Y. C.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Cohabitation Special Summons / Interlocutory Motions Regarding Affidavit of Means and Modular Trial
- Outcome
- Respondent's applications to waive affidavit of means and for modular trial refused; applicant's application to compel affidavit of means granted.
- Legal Topics
- Cohabitant Rights, Affidavit of Means, Disclosure Obligations, Modular Trial, Privacy in Litigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
X. C.
Applicant
Y. C.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cohabitation Special Summons / Interlocutory Motions Regarding Affidavit of Means and Modular Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent is obliged to file and serve an affidavit of means under Part 15 of the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010 and associated rules
- 2 Whether a modular trial should be ordered to determine preliminary issues before financial disclosure
- 3 Whether respondent's privacy concerns justify waiving or deferring disclosure obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent is under a mandatory obligation to file and serve an affidavit of means in cohabitation proceedings under Part 15 of the 2010 Act and associated rules; the court has no jurisdiction to waive or defer this obligation based on privacy concerns or the respondent's wealth. The application for a modular trial is refused as insufficient evidence was provided to justify departure from a unitary trial, and such modularisation would disproportionately prejudice the applicant.
Court Disposition
Respondent's applications to waive affidavit of means and for modular trial refused; applicant's application to compel affidavit of means granted.
Orders
- Order compelling respondent to serve an affidavit of means pursuant to O.70B, r.5(4) of the Rules of the Superior Courts.
- Matter listed for hearing on time period for compliance and costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment