X Solicitors and EirGrid (FOI Act 2014) [2017] IEIC 170087 (3 March 2017)
EirGrid failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of section 38 of the FOI Act by not notifying third parties within the prescribed timeframe, incorrectly extending the decision period under section 14(1), and misinforming the applicant about internal review rights. These procedural failures invalidated EirGrid's decision.
- Citation
- [2017] IEIC 170087
- Parties
- Applicant: X Solicitors; Respondent: EirGrid
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Review / Review by Information Commissioner Under Section 22(2) of the FOI Act
- Outcome
- decision annulled
- Legal Topics
- FOI Act 2014, Section 38 Consultation, Public Interest Exemption, Third Party Notification, Procedural Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
X Solicitors
Applicant
EirGrid
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Review / Review by Information Commissioner Under Section 22(2) of the FOI Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether EirGrid complied with section 38 notification and decision-making requirements under the FOI Act 2014
- 2 Whether EirGrid's refusal of access to records was justified
Ratio Decidendi
EirGrid failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of section 38 of the FOI Act by not notifying third parties within the prescribed timeframe, incorrectly extending the decision period under section 14(1), and misinforming the applicant about internal review rights. These procedural failures invalidated EirGrid's decision.
Court Disposition
decision annulled
Orders
- EirGrid's decision is annulled.
- EirGrid is directed to conduct a new decision-making process in compliance with section 38 of the FOI Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment