ZA v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Anor (Approved) [2021] IEHC 416 (02 June 2021)
The First Respondent breached the principle of audi alteram partem and s. 46(8)(b) of the International Protection Act 2015 by failing to notify the applicant of the 2019 EASO report, which had significant consequences for the applicant's claim and required an opportunity for submissions.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 416
- Parties
- Applicant: ZA; First Respondent: The International Protection Appeals Tribunal; Second Respondent: The Minister for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Certiorari
- Outcome
- Order of certiorari granted; decision on subsidiary protection quashed and remitted; costs awarded to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- International Protection, Audi Alteram Partem, Country of Origin Information, Subsidiary Protection, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ZA
Applicant
The International Protection Appeals Tribunal
First Respondent
The Minister for Justice
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Respondent breached the principle of audi alteram partem by failing to notify the applicant of the 2019 EASO report
- 2 Whether there was a breach of s. 46(8)(b) of the International Protection Act 2015
Ratio Decidendi
The First Respondent breached the principle of audi alteram partem and s. 46(8)(b) of the International Protection Act 2015 by failing to notify the applicant of the 2019 EASO report, which had significant consequences for the applicant's claim and required an opportunity for submissions.
Court Disposition
Order of certiorari granted; decision on subsidiary protection quashed and remitted; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- Certiorari of that portion of the First Respondent’s decision dealing with subsidiary protection under Article 15(c) of the Qualifications Directive
- Remittal of that portion of the decision to another member of the First Respondent for reconsideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment