R v Kali (CRI/A 38 of 83) [1983] LSCA 76 (15 August 1983)
The evidence did not support a conviction for rape as the complainant's testimony was not sufficiently corroborated, and the appellant's version could reasonably be true. However, there was undisputed evidence of assault, corroborated by the doctor, justifying a conviction for common assault as a competent verdict on a charge of rape.
- Citation
- [1983] LSCA 76
- Parties
- Appellant: Aupa Kali; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 1983
- Case Number
- CRI/A 38 of 83
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- conviction for rape set aside; conviction for common assault substituted
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Assault, Evidence, Corroboration, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aupa Kali
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for rape was supported by the evidence
- 2 Whether the magistrate erred in assessing the credibility of the complainant and the accused
- 3 Whether the appellant's version could reasonably be true
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not support a conviction for rape as the complainant's testimony was not sufficiently corroborated, and the appellant's version could reasonably be true. However, there was undisputed evidence of assault, corroborated by the doctor, justifying a conviction for common assault as a competent verdict on a charge of rape.
Court Disposition
conviction for rape set aside; conviction for common assault substituted
Orders
- Appellant found guilty of common assault
- Appellant sentenced to pay a fine of R25.00 or in default to 25 days imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment