Basotho National Party v management Board, Lesotho Highlands Revenue Fund and Others (CIV/APN 335 of 95) [1996] LSHC 89 (13 September 1996)

Basotho National Party v management Board, Lesotho Highlands Revenue Fund and Others (CIV/APN 335 of 95) [1996] LSHC 89 (13 September 1996)

The applicant lacked locus standi as it did not demonstrate a direct and substantial legal interest in the subject matter; its interest was no more than that of any member of the public. The application was therefore dismissed for want of standing.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] LSHC 89
Parties
Applicant: Basotho National Party; 1st Respondent: The Management Board, Lesotho Highlands Revenue Fund; 2nd Respondent: The Minister of Finance; 3rd Respondent: The Attorney-General
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CIV/APN 335 of 95
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (locus Standi) and Merits
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Public Interest Litigation, Misuse of Public Funds, Statutory Interpretation
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Locus Standi Public Interest Litigation Misuse of Public Funds Statutory Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Basotho National Party

Applicant

The Management Board, Lesotho Highlands Revenue Fund

1st Respondent

The Minister of Finance

2nd Respondent

The Attorney-General

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (locus Standi) and Merits

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring the application
  2. 2 Whether the disbursement of funds from the Lesotho Highlands Revenue Fund was illegal, irregular, sectarian, or contrary to Legal Notice No. 91 of 1992

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant lacked locus standi as it did not demonstrate a direct and substantial legal interest in the subject matter; its interest was no more than that of any member of the public. The application was therefore dismissed for want of standing.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs