Maphathe v I, Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd and Others (C of A (CIV) 2 of 2012) [2012] LSCA 14 (27 April 2012)
There is a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the sub-lease was registered and whether the statutory requirements were complied with. These issues were not properly investigated in the court below and must be determined by oral evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] LSCA 14
- Parties
- Appellant: Benjamin Maphathe; 1st Respondent: I. Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Master of the High Court; 3rd Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Case Number
- C of A (CIV) 2 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Sub Leases, Ministerial Consent, Enforceability of Unregistered Leases
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Maphathe
Appellant
I. Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd
1st Respondent
Master of the High Court
2nd Respondent
Attorney General
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sub-lease in question was registered as required by law
- 2 Whether the provisions of section 24 of the Deeds Registry Act 1967 as amended were complied with
Ratio Decidendi
There is a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the sub-lease was registered and whether the statutory requirements were complied with. These issues were not properly investigated in the court below and must be determined by oral evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COUR T OF AP P E AL OF LE S OTHO C OF A (CIV) No .2 / 2 0 1 2 In th e m a tter b etween : BE NJ AMIN MAPHATHE AP PE LLANT AND I, KUPE R (LE S OTH O) (P TY) LTD MAS TE R OF THE HIGH COUR T THE ATTOR NE Y GE NE R AL 1 S T R E S P ONDE NT 2 ND R E S PONDE NT 3 R D R E S P ONDE NT COR AM: RAMODIBE DI, P HOWIE , J A FARLAM, J A HE AR D: DE LIVE R E D: 2 0 APRIL 2 0 1 2 2 7 APRIL 2 0 1 2 S UMMA R Y In te rd ict – Th e firs t re s pon d en t a p ply in g for an in te rd ict in th e High Cou rt re s tra in in g th e appe llan t from in te rferin g w ith its righ ts of occu p a tion , pos s es s ion , con trol an d ad m in is tra tion of Pa ts a S h opp in g Cen tre , Plots 0 6 4 7 2 – 0 4 1 an d 0 6 4 7 2 – 2 2 2 as w e ll as re s tra in in g h im from collectin g ren ta ls from an y of th e te n an ts on th e p re m is e s – Th e appe llan t ch a lle n gin g th e firs t re s pon d en t’s s u ble as e in re s pect of th e pre m is e s on tw o b a s e s , n a m e ly , (1 ) th a t th e re w a s n o prior m in is te ria l con s en t an d (2 ) th a t th e s u ble as e w a s n ot re gis te re d – S ection s 3 5 (1 ) (b) (iii) an d 3 6 of th e Lan d Act 1 9 7 9 – Regis tra tion – S ection 2 4 of th e Dee d s Re gis try Act 1 9 6 7 as a m e n d ed by s 9 4 of th e Lan d Act 1 9 7 9 – Th e appe al u ph e ld w ith cos ts a n d th e is s u e of regis tra tion re m itte d to th e High Cou rt for d e te rm in a tion . J UDGME NT R AMODIBE DI P [1 ] Th e d is p u t e in t h is a p p ea l a r os e ou t of a n a gr eem en t of a s u b lea s e con clu d ed in 1 9 9 0 b y a n d b et ween t h e la te Dr Ken n et h Th u lo Ma p h a t h e a s t h e s u b -les s or a n d t h e fir s t r es p on d en t a s t h e s u b -les s ee. Th e s u b -lea s e wa s in r es p ect of a com m er cia l p r op er ty k n own a s Pa ts a S h op p in g Cen tr e, Plot s 0 6 4 7 2 – 0 4 1 a n d 0 6 4 7 2 – 2 2 2 , s itu a t ed a t Ma feten g Ur b a n Ar ea . [2 ] In ter m s of t h e s u b -lea s e a gr eem en t , t h e la te Dr Ma p h a t h e s u b let t h e p r op er ty to t h e fir s t r es p on d en t for a p er iod of 2 5 yea r s , wit h two op tion s to r en ew t h e a gr eem en t for t wo fu r t h er p er iod s of 1 0 yea r s ea ch . [3 ] It is com m on ca u s e b etween t h e p a r ties t h a t t h e la t e Dr Ma p h a t h e d ied in or a b ou t 2 0 0 0 . Fu r t h er m or e, t h e p a r ties a r e on com m on gr ou n d t h a t in or a b ou t Ap r il 2 0 0 3 t h e fir s t r es p on d en t a p p oin ted t h e a p p ella n t a s its a gen t to collect r en ta ls a n d to m a n a ge t h e a ffa ir s of t h e S h op p in g Cen tr e for m in g t h e s u b ject m a t ter of t h e d is p u te in t h is m a t ter . [4 ] It is t h e fir s t r es p on d en t’s ca s e t h a t it ter m in a ted t h e a p p ella n t’s a p p oin t m en t a s its a gen t on or a b ou t 1 0 Octob er 2 0 0 8 . It con t en d s , t h er efor e, t h a t t h e a p p ella n t h a s n o a u t h or ity t o collect t h e r en ta ls a n d to cla im t h e S h op p in g Cen t r e a s h is p r op er ty. Con s equ en tly, it is t h e fir s t r es p on d en t’s ca s e t h a t t h e a p p ella n t is a ctin g fr a u d u len tly a n d u n la wfu lly in d oin g s o. Th e a p p ella n t , wh o is a lleged to b e t h e la t e Dr Ma p h a t h e’s s on a n d h eir , d en ies t h es e a llega tion s . He m a in t a in s t h a t h e d id n ot a ccep t t h e a lleged ter m in a tion of h is a p p oin t m en t a s t h e fir s t r es p on d en t’s a gen t . [5 ] It is n eces s a r y to s t a t e t h a t t h e a p p ella n t ch a llen ges t h e fir s t r es p on d en t’s s u b -lea s e on two b a s es , n a m ely:- (1 ) Th a t t h er e wa s n o p r ior m in is ter ia l con s en t wh en t h e s u b -lea s e in qu es tion wa s con clu d ed . Th e a p p ella n t s eek s t o r ely on s ection s 3 5 (1 ) (b ) (iii) a n d 3 6 of t h e La n d Act 1 9 7 9 . (2 ) Th a t t h e s u b -lea s e wa s n ot r egis ter ed . In t h is r ega r d t h e a p p ella n t r elies m a in ly on s ection 2 4 of t h e Deed s Regis tr y Act 1 9 6 7 a s a m en d ed . [6 ] In view of t h e con clu s ion I h a ve a r r ived a t in t h is m a t ter , it is s tr ictly n ot n eces s a r y t o d eter m in e t h e a p p ella n t’s fir s t ch a llen ge r ela tin g t o p r ior m in is ter ia l con s en t a t t h is s ta ge. Th a t is s u e will h a ve t o a wa it a n ot h er d a y. It is in s t r u ctive to ob s er ve, h owever , t h a t t h is Cou r t h a s d ea lt wit h a s im ila r p oin t in t h is s es s ion in t h e ca s e of C & S P r o p e r t ie s Lt d v Dr 'Ma m p h o n o Kh a k e t la & Ot h e r s C o f A (CIV) 6 3 / 2 0 1 1 . It is a ls o im p or ta n t t o ob s er ve fu r t h er t h a t in t h a t ca s e t h er e wa s n o u n cer ta in ty a b ou t r egis tr a t ion . Th e s u b -lea s e for m in g t h e s u b ject m a t ter of t h e d is p u t e h a d d u ly b een r egis ter ed . [7 ] In d eter m in in g t h e a p p ella n t’s ch a llen ge t o t h e fir s t r es p on d en t ’s s u b -lea s e on t h e b a s is t h a t it wa s n ot r egis ter ed it is n eces s a r y t o h a ve r ega r d to t h e a ffid a vits of t h e r es p ective p a r ties . [8 ] In p a r a gr a p h 5 of h is fou n d in g a ffid a vit As h r a f Ab u b a k er , wh o is t h e fir s t r es p on d en t’s Ma n a gin g Dir ect or , d ep os ed a s follows :- “Th e agree m e n t of s u ble as e , An n exu re “B ”, w a s properly regis te re d aga in s t th e Lan d Act Le as e is s u e d in favou r of th e la te Maph a th e a s w ill m ore fu lly s h ow from An n ex u re “C” h e re to be in g a tru e copy of th e La n d Act Le as e is s u e d u n d er n u m be r 0 6 4 7 2 – 2 2 2 an d 0 6 4 7 2 – 0 4 1 Mafe te n g Urba n Are a.” [9 ] A p er u s a l of An n exu r e “C” s h ows t h a t it is in fa ct t h e or igin a l lea s e wh ich wa s is s u ed t o t h e la t e Dr Ma p h a t h e. It b ea r s s ever a l en d or s em en ts on p a ge 2 , in clu d in g t h e fir s t r es p on d en t ’s n a m e wh ich is h a n d -wr itt en on t h e left h a n d top cor n er . It is , h owever , in con clu s ive on wh et h er or n ot t h e s u b lea s e wa s r egis ter ed in fa vou r of t h e fir s t r es p on d en t . It is n ot a p p a r en t fr om An n exu r e “C” wh et h er or n ot t h e en d or s em en t in qu es tion r efer s t o t h e s u b -lea s e in qu es tion . Th e p a r ties h old d iver gen t views on t h e is s u e. [1 0 ] In p a r a gr a p h s 4 ,5 a n d 6 of h is a n s wer in g a ffid a vit t h e a p p ella n t m a d e t h e followin g a ver m en ts in r es p on s e t o p a r a gr a p h 5 of As h r a f Ab u b a k er ’s a ffid a vit qu oted in p a r a gr a p h [8 ] a b ove:- “Th e con te n ts h e re in [are ] n ote d s a ve to s a y th a t th e s u b -le as e a gree m e n t w a s n ot re gis te re d for tw e n ty five y e ars in re s pect of th e Applican t h e re in . I av e r th a t th e Applican t is pu t to [th e ] proof th e reof. An d I fu rth e r av e r th a t w ith ou t th e proof of th e s u b-le as e a gree m en t [h av in g] bee n regis te re d in re s pect of th e th e s a id agre e m e n t a pplican t [is ] n ot prope r, an d n ot en force able in la w , a n d a s a re s u lt th e a pplica n t h a s n o righ ts w h a ts oe ve r in th e e s ta te of th e la te Maph a th e .” [1 1 ] Section 2 4 of t h e Deed s Regis tr y Act a s a m en d ed b y s 9 4 of t h e La n d Act 1 9 7 9 on r egis tr a t ion r equ ir es qu ot a tion in fu ll b eca u s e of its im p or ta n ce t o r egis tr a tion of lon g t er m a gr eem en ts of lea s es or s u b -lea s es in r es p ect of im m ova b le p r op er ty. It r ea d s a s follows :- “2 4 . (1 ) [S av e a s is oth e rw is e prov id e d in th e La n d Act 1 9 7 9 or an y oth e r la w ], eve ry agree m e n t of le as e or s u b -lea s e of righ ts in or to im m ov able prope rty w h ich w h e n en te re d in to w a s for a pe riod of n ot le s s th an th re e y e ars , or for th e n a tu ral life of th e le s s ee , or an y oth e r pers on m e n tion e d in th e le as e or s u b -le as e , or w h ich is ren e w a ble from tim e to tim e for period s w h ich toge th e r w ith th e firs t pe riod a m ou n t to le s s th a n th ree y e ars , s h all be re gis te re d in th e d eed s regis try . S u ch re gis tra tion s h all on ly be effecte d af te r th e (2 ) proper au th ority h as con s en te d in w ritin g to th e le s s ee occu py in g an d u s in g th e lan d to w h ich th e le as e refers , w h ich con s e n t s h a ll n ot be u n re as on ably w ith h e ld . (3 ) [S av e as is oth e rw is e prov id e d in th e Lan d Act 1 9 7 9 or an y oth e r la w ], eve ry agree m e n t of le as e or s u b -lea s e of righ ts in or to im m ov able prope rty a n d to w h ich th e proper a u th ority h as con s e n te d in w ritin g s h all be lod ge d for regis tra tion in th e d ee d s re gis try w ith in th re e m on th s of th e gran tin g of s u ch con s en t. (4 ) [S av e as is oth e rw is e prov id e d in th e Lan d Act 1 9 7 9 or an y oth e r la w ], eve ry agree m e n t of le as e or s u b -le as e of righ ts or to im m ov able prope rty a n d to w h ich th e prope r a u th ority con s en te d in w ritin g prior to th e com m e n cem e n t of th is act s h a ll be lod ged for re gis tra tion in th e d ee d s regis try w ith in th ree m on th s of th e d a te of com m e n cem e n t of th is Act. Fa ilu re to lod ge s u ch le as e or s u b -le as e for (5 ) regis tra tion w ith in s u ch ex te n d e d pe riod a s th e cou rt m a y a llow s h all re n d e r th e agre e m e n t of le as e or s u b -le as e n u ll an d void an d of n o force an d effect. [S av e as is oth e rw is e prov id e d in th e Lan d Act 1 9 7 9 (6 ) or an y oth e r la w ], an y agre e m e n t of le as e or s u b -le as e of righ ts in or to im m ov able prope rty execu te d , a tte s te d or regis te re d con tra ry to th e prov is ion s of th is s e ction s h all be n u ll an d void a n d of n o force an d effect.” Th e s qu a r e b r a ck ets , a s is th e cu s tom , in d ica te a m en d m en ts m a d e to t h e s ection . [1 2 ] Th er e is , in m y view, a gen u in e d is p u t e of fa ct on wh et h er or n ot t h e s u b -lea s e in qu es tion wa s r egis ter ed a n d wh et h er t h e p r ovis ion s of s ection 2 4 of t h e Deed s Regis tr y Act a s a m en d ed wer e com p lied wit h . Th es e is s u es wer e n ot p r op er ly in ves tiga ted in t h e cou r t b elow. It is in t h e in t er es ts of a ju s t exp ed itiou s d ecis ion a n d t h a t t h e p a r ties b e given a n op p or tu n ity t o d o s o b y r em ittin g t h e m a t ter t o t h e cou r t a qu o for t h e h ea r in g of or a l evid en ce. [1 3 ] It follows t h a t t h e a p p ea l s u cceed s a n d t h e followin g or d er is m a d e:- (1 ) Th e a p p ea l is u p h eld wit h cos t s . (2 ) Th e or d er of t h e cou r t a qu o is s et a s id e. (3 ) Th e m a t ter is r em it ted to t h e cou r t a qu o for t h e h ea r in g of or a l evid en ce on wh et h er or n ot t h e s u b -lea s e in qu es tion wa s r egis ter ed a n d wh et h er t h e p r ovis ion s of s ection 2 4 of t h e Deed s Regis tr y Act 1 9 6 7 a s a m en d ed wer e com p lied wit h . (4 ) Th e p a r ties s h a ll b e en titled to s u p p lem en t t h e p r es en t p a p er s a s t h ey d eem fit. ____________________________ M. M. R AMODIBE DI PR E SIDE NT OF THE COUR T OF AP PE AL I a gr ee: ___________________________ C. T. H OWIE J US TICE OF AP PE AL I a gr ee: ___________________________ I. G. F AR LAM J US TICE OF AP PE AL F o r t h e Ap p e lla n t : Dr . K. E . Mos it o KC (wit h h im Ad v. M. Ra fon ek e) F o r 1 s t R e s p o n d e n t : Ad v. T. R. Mp a k a