Maphathe v I, Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd and Others (C of A (CIV) 2 of 2012) [2012] LSCA 14 (27 April 2012)

Maphathe v I, Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd and Others (C of A (CIV) 2 of 2012) [2012] LSCA 14 (27 April 2012)

There is a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the sub-lease was registered and whether the statutory requirements were complied with. These issues were not properly investigated in the court below and must be determined by oral evidence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] LSCA 14
Parties
Appellant: Benjamin Maphathe; 1st Respondent: I. Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Master of the High Court; 3rd Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
C of A (CIV) 2 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal upheld
Legal Topics
Registration of Sub Leases, Ministerial Consent, Enforceability of Unregistered Leases
Source Language
en
Property Law Land Law Registration of Sub Leases Ministerial Consent Enforceability of Unregistered Leases

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benjamin Maphathe

Appellant

I. Kuper (Lesotho) (Pty) Ltd

1st Respondent

Master of the High Court

2nd Respondent

Attorney General

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the sub-lease in question was registered as required by law
  2. 2 Whether the provisions of section 24 of the Deeds Registry Act 1967 as amended were complied with

Ratio Decidendi

There is a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the sub-lease was registered and whether the statutory requirements were complied with. These issues were not properly investigated in the court below and must be determined by oral evidence.

Court Disposition

appeal upheld

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld with costs.
  • The order of the court a quo is set aside.