Thompson v Unoaha and Others (C of A (CIV) 58 of 2011) [2012] LSCA 23 (27 April 2012)
The High Court erred in granting contempt orders to enforce a monetary judgment; such orders are not enforceable by committal for contempt.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] LSCA 23
- Parties
- Appellant: Bisi Thompson; 1st Respondent: Uche Unoaha; 2nd Respondent: Ike Moyeni; 3rd Respondent: Officer Commanding – Maseru Central Charge Office; 4th Respondent: The Commissioner of Police; 5th Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Case Number
- C of A (CIV) 58 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Monetary Judgments
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bisi Thompson
Appellant
Uche Unoaha
1st Respondent
Ike Moyeni
2nd Respondent
Officer Commanding – Maseru Central Charge Office
3rd Respondent
The Commissioner of Police
4th Respondent
The Attorney General
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether contempt proceedings can be used to enforce a monetary judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court erred in granting contempt orders to enforce a monetary judgment; such orders are not enforceable by committal for contempt.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- Appeal upheld with costs
- Order of the court a quo set aside and replaced with: 'The application is dismissed with costs.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COUR T OF AP PE AL OF LE S OTH O C OF A (CIV) 5 8 / 2 0 1 1 HE LD AT MAS E R U: In t h e m a t ter b etween :- BIS I THOMP S ON APPE LLANT a n d UCHE UNOAH A IKE MONYE NI 1 S T RE S PONDE NT 2 ND RE S PONDE NT OF F ICE R COMMANDING – MASE R U CE NTR AL CHAR GE OF F ICE 3 RD RE SPONDE NT THE COMMIS SIONE R OF P OLICE 4 TH RE SPONDE NT THE ATTOR NE Y GE NE R AL 5 TH RE SPONDE NT COR AM : RAMODIBE LI, P FARLAM, J A HE AR D : 1 8 APRIL 2 0 1 2 DE LIVE R E D: 2 7 APRIL 2 0 1 2 J UDGME NT F a r la m , J A On 9 Au gu s t 2 0 1 0 Ch a k a -Ma k h o o a n e J gr a n ted a n or d er in High Cou r t ca s e CIV/ T/ 2 5 3 / 1 0 a ga in s t t h e a p p ella n t, t h e fir s t d efen d a n t in t h a t ca s e Ben ja m in Or jiy, t h e s econ d d efen d a n t, in wh ich s h e or d er ed t h em , join tly a n d s ever a lly, to p a y M5 0 0 ,0 0 0 .0 0 a s d a m a ges for d efa m a tion , toget h er wit h in ter es t a n d cos ts on t h e a t t or n ey a n d own clien t s ca le, t o t h e fir s t a n d s econ d r es p on d en ts . On 1 0 Sep tem b er 2 0 1 0 t h is or d er n ot h a vin g b een com p lied wit h , t h e fir s t a n d s econ d r es p on d en ts b r ou gh t a n a p p lica tion in wh ich t h ey s ou gh t , in t er a lia , or d er s (a ) d ecla r in g t h e a p p ella n t t o b e t h e con t em p t of t h e or d er gr a n ted on 9 Au gu s t 2 0 1 0 ; (b ) com m ittin g h im t o p r is on for a p er iod of n ot les s t h a n 3 0 d a ys for s u ch con tem p t, a lliter a tively or d er in g h im t o p a y a fin e of n ot les s t h a n M1 0 ,0 0 0 .0 0 for s u ch con t em p t . On 1 9 t h Oct ob er 2 0 1 1 Ch a k a -Ma k h o o a n e J gr a n t ed t h is a p p lica tion , m a k in g t h e followin g or d er : “(a ) Th e [a p p ella n t] is d ecla r ed to b e in con t em p t of a n or d er of t h is cou r t . (b ) Th e [a p p ella n t] is to p a y a fin e of M1 0 ,0 0 0 .0 0 fa ilin g wh ich h e s h a ll b e com m it ted to p r is on for a p er iod n ot exceed in g 3 0 d a ys . Th e fin e is to b e d efer r ed for 1 4 d a ys fr om t h e d a te of t h e ju d gm en t. (c) Th e [a p p ella n t] is to p a y t h e cos t of t h is in a h igh er s ca le. (d ) Th e or d er is s till t o b e com p lied wit h .” Th e a p p ella n t h a s a p p ea led a ga in s t t h is or d er or a n u m b er of gr ou n d s wh ich wer e s et ou t in h is n otice of a p p ea l. S u b s equ en tly h e filed a n otice of h is in ten tion for t h e d ela y in filin g t h e n ot ice s ettin g ou t t h es e gr ou n d s . Th e a p p lica tion for con d on a t ion wa s n ot op p os ed a n d is gr a n ted . On e of t h e fu r t h er gr ou n d s r a is ed in t h e n otice is t h a t t h e cou r t a qu o er r ed in la w b y a s u p gr a n tin g t h e a p p lica tion in r es p ect of a n or d er for t h e p a ym en t of m on ey. A t h is p oin t is clea r ly cor r ect . Th e or d er s ou gh t t o b e en for ced wa s a s im p le or d er a d pecu n ia m s olven d a m , i.e. for p a ym en t of a m on eta r y s u m , it is tr ite t h a t s u ch a n or d er ca n n ot b e en for ced b y a n or d er for com m it ta l: s ee, e.g. Mo t a u n g a n d a n o t h e r v P h e k o Bu ild in g Co n s t r u c t io n LAC (2 0 0 0 -2 0 0 4 ) 2 4 3 a n d Me t r o p o lit a n In d u s t r ia l Co r p o r a t io n v H u gh e s 1 9 6 9 (1 ) SA 2 2 4 (T) a t 2 2 7 . It is t h u s clea r t h a t t h e ju d ge er r ed in gr a n t in g t h e or d er t h a t s h e d id a n d t h e a p p ea l m u s t a ccor d in gly b e u p h eld wit h cos t s . Th e followin g or d er is m a d e: 1 . Th e a p p ea l is u p h eld wit h cos t s . 2 . Th e or d er m a d e in t h e cou r t a qu o is s et a s id e a n d r ep la ced wit h t h e followin g; ‘Th e a p p lica tion is d is m is s ed wit h cos ts .’ I. G. F AR LAM J US TICE OF AP PE AL