R v Forrester (CRI/A 68 of 79) [1980] LSHC 17 (13 March 1980)

R v Forrester (CRI/A 68 of 79) [1980] LSHC 17 (13 March 1980)

The appellant's insertion of false job numbers on official documents constituted misrepresentation, made at least recklessly, and was capable of causing actual or potential prejudice to the employer and third parties. The magistrate was entitled to infer intent to defraud, and the appellant's failure to testify left the prima facie case unanswered. Conviction and sentence were justified.

Citation
[1980] LSHC 17
Parties
Appellant: Brian Alexander Forrester; Respondent: Rex
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
13 March 1980
Case Number
CRI/A 68 of 79
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
Legal Topics
Fraud, Misrepresentation, Intent to Defraud, Potential Prejudice
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Fraud Misrepresentation Intent to Defraud Potential Prejudice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian Alexander Forrester

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's conduct amounted to fraud under the law
  2. 2 Whether there was intent to defraud or mere negligence/inadvertence
  3. 3 Whether the misrepresentations were capable of causing actual or potential prejudice

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's insertion of false job numbers on official documents constituted misrepresentation, made at least recklessly, and was capable of causing actual or potential prejudice to the employer and third parties. The magistrate was entitled to infer intent to defraud, and the appellant's failure to testify left the prima facie case unanswered. Conviction and sentence were justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.