Matee v R (CRI/APN 426 of 2000) [2000] LSCA 59 (31 July 2000)
The Court found the prosecution's case illogical and unsupported by evidence, particularly regarding the chronology of alleged offences and the claim of resisting arrest for a crime not yet committed. The Court held that there was no sufficient evidence to show the applicant would abscond or interfere with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] LSCA 59
- Parties
- Applicant: Churchill Malunga Matee; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2000
- Case Number
- CRI/APN 426 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Attempted Murder, Murder, Arms and Ammunition Offences
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Churchill Malunga Matee
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending trial given the seriousness and multiplicity of charges
- 2 Whether the applicant is likely to abscond or interfere with witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the prosecution's case illogical and unsupported by evidence, particularly regarding the chronology of alleged offences and the claim of resisting arrest for a crime not yet committed. The Court held that there was no sufficient evidence to show the applicant would abscond or interfere with witnesses, and thus bail should be granted under specified conditions.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Applicant granted bail on conditions set out in paragraph 21 of his petition: attend remands, pay M500 cash, find surety in the sum of M3000, stand trial, and report at Maputsoe Police Station every Saturday between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment