Mapetla v Mapetla (LC/APN 14) [2016] LSHC 1 (14 June 2016)
Only objections going to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised after the first appearance; all other preliminary objections are deemed waived if not raised at the first court appearance. The Land Court has jurisdiction over the dispute as it concerns title to land under Section 73 of the Land Act 2010. The 1st Respondent's objections are dismissed as they were not timely raised and do not affect the validity of the judgment.
- Citation
- [2016] LSHC 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Doris Nkundlandle Mapetla; 1st Respondent: Aaron Mapetla; 2nd Respondent: Land Administration Authority; 3rd Respondent: O/C Maseru Central Charge Office; 4th Respondent: Commissioner of Police; 5th Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2016
- Case Number
- LC/APN 14
- Procedural Posture
- Land Dispute / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
- Outcome
- Preliminary objections dismissed with costs on attorney-and-own-client scale.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objections, Prescription, Non Joinder, Locus Standi, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Doris Nkundlandle Mapetla
Applicant
Aaron Mapetla
1st Respondent
Land Administration Authority
2nd Respondent
O/C Maseru Central Charge Office
3rd Respondent
Commissioner of Police
4th Respondent
Attorney General
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether preliminary objections not raised at first appearance can be entertained
- 2 Whether the Land Court has jurisdiction over the dispute
- 3 Whether the claim is prescribed
Ratio Decidendi
Only objections going to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised after the first appearance; all other preliminary objections are deemed waived if not raised at the first court appearance. The Land Court has jurisdiction over the dispute as it concerns title to land under Section 73 of the Land Act 2010. The 1st Respondent's objections are dismissed as they were not timely raised and do not affect the validity of the judgment.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objections dismissed with costs on attorney-and-own-client scale.
Orders
- Points of law raised by 1st Respondent dismissed
- Costs awarded to Applicant on attorney-and-own-client scale
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment