Hyperama (Proprietary) Limited v O.K Bazaars (1929) Limited ((CIV) 20 of 88) [1990] LSCA 4 (12 June 1990)
The appellant's convictions were upheld because the statements made to Mr. Van Staden were admissible, the appointment was valid under Regulation 19(1) with severability applied to the appointment document, and the evidence established contraventions of the Exchange Control Regulations and the Central Bank of Lesotho Act.
- Citation
- [1990] LSCA 4
- Parties
- Appellant: Edward Hae Phoofolo; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 1990
- Case Number
- (CIV) 20 of 88
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Exchange Control Regulations, Central Bank of Lesotho Act, Admissibility of Evidence, Delegation and Severability, Conflict of Statements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Hae Phoofolo
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's convictions under the Exchange Control Regulations and Central Bank of Lesotho Act were proper
- 2 Whether the appointment and authority of Mr. Van Staden was valid and statements made to him admissible
- 3 Whether the doctrine of severability applied to the appointment document
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's convictions were upheld because the statements made to Mr. Van Staden were admissible, the appointment was valid under Regulation 19(1) with severability applied to the appointment document, and the evidence established contraventions of the Exchange Control Regulations and the Central Bank of Lesotho Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment