R v Mantsoe (CRI/A 69 of 87) [1988] LSHC 34 (4 March 1988)
The appellant was negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout for pedestrians, and the trial court was correct in convicting him on the alternative charge of negligent driving. The suspension of the driving licence was mandatory under the law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1988] LSHC 34
- Parties
- Appellant: Khojane Nkholi Mantsoe; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 1988
- Case Number
- CRI/A 69 of 87
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Culpable Homicide, Negligent Driving, Failure to Remain at Accident Scene, Suspension of Driving Licence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khojane Nkholi Mantsoe
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was negligent in causing the death of the deceased by driving
- 2 Whether the conviction on the alternative charge of negligent driving was proper
- 3 Whether the suspension of the appellant's driving licence was mandatory under the law
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout for pedestrians, and the trial court was correct in convicting him on the alternative charge of negligent driving. The suspension of the driving licence was mandatory under the law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction on alternative charge of negligent driving upheld
- Order suspending appellant's driving licence for 6 months confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment