Labour Commissioner v CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd (LC 70 of 4) [2005] LSLC 9 (18 October 2005)
The respondent failed to consult the complainants prior to retrenchment, violating the fundamental requirement of consultation in retrenchment, rendering the retrenchment unfair. The respondent also frustrated the reemployment of the complainants as per the DDPR settlement agreement.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] LSLC 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Labour Commissioner; Respondent: CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2005
- Case Number
- LC 70 of 4
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for applicant
- Legal Topics
- Retrenchment, Consultation, Unfair Dismissal, Settlement Agreement, Reemployment
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Labour Commissioner
Applicant
CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult the complainants prior to retrenchment
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to reemploy the complainants as per the DDPR settlement agreement
- 3 Whether the retrenchment was unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to consult the complainants prior to retrenchment, violating the fundamental requirement of consultation in retrenchment, rendering the retrenchment unfair. The respondent also frustrated the reemployment of the complainants as per the DDPR settlement agreement.
Court Disposition
judgment for applicant
Orders
- Respondent to reemploy the three complainants on a date not later than 21st November 2005.
- Respondent to pay the wages the complainants would have earned from 8th November 2004 to the date of reemployment, such payments to be made to the office of the Labour Commissioner not later than 21st November 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment