Monaphathi v Sehloho (CIV/T 503 of 88) [1990] LSCA 27 (2 February 1990)
The plaintiff established a prima facie case that he completed the contracted work and is entitled to payment. The defendant failed to provide evidence to rebut this, and his allegations were unsupported. Judgment is granted for the plaintiff as prayed.
- Citation
- [1990] LSCA 27
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lebohang Monaphathi; Defendant: Fred Se hloho
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 1990
- Case Number
- CIV/T 503 of 88
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Oral Contract, Building Contract, Payment for Work Done, Breach of Contract, Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lebohang Monaphathi
Plaintiff
Fred Se hloho
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff completed the work as agreed under the oral contract
- 2 Whether the defendant is liable to pay the claimed amount for work done
- 3 Whether the defendant's allegations of theft and incomplete work are substantiated
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff established a prima facie case that he completed the contracted work and is entitled to payment. The defendant failed to provide evidence to rebut this, and his allegations were unsupported. Judgment is granted for the plaintiff as prayed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded M3,000-00 plus interest at 11%
- Defendant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment