Sekei v Majoro and Others (CIV/T 558 of 87) [1990] LSCA 32 (2 February 1990)
The plaintiff established a prima facie case of completion of contracted works and entitlement to payment, which was not rebutted by the defendant through evidence. The defendant's allegations were unsupported and did not justify withholding payment.
- Citation
- [1990] LSCA 32
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LEBOHANG MONAPHATHI; Defendant: FRED SEHLOHO
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 1990
- Case Number
- CIV/T 558 of 87
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Oral Contract, Building Contract, Quantum Meruit, Proof of Performance, Set Off
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LEBOHANG MONAPHATHI
Plaintiff
FRED SEHLOHO
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff completed the contracted building works and is entitled to payment
- 2 Whether the defendant is entitled to withhold payment due to alleged theft or incomplete work
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff established a prima facie case of completion of contracted works and entitlement to payment, which was not rebutted by the defendant through evidence. The defendant's allegations were unsupported and did not justify withholding payment.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff M3,000-00
- Defendant to pay interest at 11% per annum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment