Sello v Semamola and Others (duplicate of A077 0026) (CIV/APN 319 of 96) [1996] LSHC 85 (30 August 1996)

Sello v Semamola and Others (duplicate of A077 0026) (CIV/APN 319 of 96) [1996] LSHC 85 (30 August 1996)

The applicant, as husband and heir, has the right to bury his deceased wife, but customary law and good morals require consultation with the deceased's maiden family before burial. The court confirmed the applicant's right to bury but emphasized the necessity of consultation, and declined to award costs due to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] LSHC 85
Parties
Applicant: Lebohang Sello; 1st Respondent: 'Mamotlatsi Semamola; 2nd Respondent: Motlatsi Semamola; 3rd Respondent: The Proprietor Mangwane Funeral Service
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CIV/APN 319 of 96
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Outcome
Rule confirmed in terms of prayers 2(a) and (c) of the Notice of Motion; deceased's body released to applicant for burial; no order as to costs; contempt application declined.
Legal Topics
Burial Rights, Consultation Between Families, Heir's Rights, Contempt of Court, Costs
Source Language
en
Family Law Customary Law Burial Rights Consultation Between Families Heir's Rights Contempt of Court Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lebohang Sello

Applicant

'Mamotlatsi Semamola

1st Respondent

Motlatsi Semamola

2nd Respondent

The Proprietor Mangwane Funeral Service

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Who has the right to determine the burial of a deceased married woman under customary law?
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to bury his deceased wife without consultation with her maiden family.
  3. 3 Whether the conduct of the parties warranted an award of costs or contempt.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant, as husband and heir, has the right to bury his deceased wife, but customary law and good morals require consultation with the deceased's maiden family before burial. The court confirmed the applicant's right to bury but emphasized the necessity of consultation, and declined to award costs due to the conduct of both parties and the family nature of the dispute.

Court Disposition

Rule confirmed in terms of prayers 2(a) and (c) of the Notice of Motion; deceased's body released to applicant for burial; no order as to costs; contempt application declined.

Orders

  • Applicant confirmed as entitled to bury the deceased.
  • Deceased's body released to applicant for burial.