R v Rantsoti (CR 99/99; CRI/A/35/99) [2000] LSCA 19 (6 March 2000)

R v Rantsoti (CR 99/99; CRI/A/35/99) [2000] LSCA 19 (6 March 2000)

The conviction was upheld because the complainant was found to be a credible and trustworthy witness, her evidence was corroborated by physical findings of strangulation, and the lack of consent was established beyond reasonable doubt despite the absence of timely medical corroboration.

Citation
[2000] LSCA 19
Parties
Appellant: Lekanyane Rantsoti; Respondent: Rex
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
6 March 2000
Case Number
CR 99/99 ; CRI/A/35/99
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed
Legal Topics
Rape, Corroboration, Consent, Evidence Assessment
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Rape Corroboration Consent Evidence Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lekanyane Rantsoti

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape was proper in the absence of medical corroboration
  2. 2 Whether the complainant's evidence was credible and trustworthy
  3. 3 Whether lack of consent was established

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was upheld because the complainant was found to be a credible and trustworthy witness, her evidence was corroborated by physical findings of strangulation, and the lack of consent was established beyond reasonable doubt despite the absence of timely medical corroboration.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The conviction for rape is confirmed.