Lesotho Co-Operative Handicrafts Ltd and Others v Commission of Inquiry into Cooperatives (CIV/APN/471/93; C of A (CIV ) 1/94) [1994] LSCA 125 (28 July 1994)

Lesotho Co-Operative Handicrafts Ltd and Others v Commission of Inquiry into Cooperatives (CIV/APN/471/93; C of A (CIV ) 1/94) [1994] LSCA 125 (28 July 1994)

The refusal by the Commission to allow the appellants' attorney to cross-examine the Minister, whose evidence was material and potentially adverse to the appellants, constituted a breach of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing. This irregularity prejudiced the appellants and resulted in a failure of justice.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1994] LSCA 125
Parties
Appellant: Lesotho Co-Operative Handicrafts Ltd; Appellant: Lesotho Poultry Co-Operative Union Ltd; Appellant: Leribe District Co-Operative Union Ltd; Appellant: Phela-U-Pheli Se Co-Operative Union Ltd; Appellant: Mafeteng District Co-Operative Union Ltd; Respondent: The Commission of Inquiry into Cooperatives
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CIV/APN/471/93 ; C of A (CIV ) 1/94
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Natural Justice, Right to Fair Hearing, Commissions of Inquiry, Cross Examination
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Constitutional Law Natural Justice Right to Fair Hearing Commissions of Inquiry Cross Examination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lesotho Co-Operative Handicrafts Ltd

Appellant

Lesotho Poultry Co-Operative Union Ltd

Appellant

Leribe District Co-Operative Union Ltd

Appellant

Phela-U-Pheli Se Co-Operative Union Ltd

Appellant

Mafeteng District Co-Operative Union Ltd

Appellant

The Commission of Inquiry into Cooperatives

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether refusal to allow cross-examination of a key witness before a Commission of Inquiry constituted a breach of natural justice and fair hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The refusal by the Commission to allow the appellants' attorney to cross-examine the Minister, whose evidence was material and potentially adverse to the appellants, constituted a breach of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing. This irregularity prejudiced the appellants and resulted in a failure of justice.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Declaration that the refusal to allow cross-examination constituted an irregularity and breach of fair hearing.
  • Respondent to pay costs of suit.