R v Mathaba (CRI/A 42 of 80) [1980] LSHC 70 (1 December 1980)
Given the unusual and mitigating circumstances, justice required that the appellant serve no more than one year substantive imprisonment for culpable homicide, with the remainder of the sentence suspended on conditions.
- Citation
- [1980] LSHC 70
- Parties
- Appellant: Lisema Mathaba; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 1980
- Case Number
- CRI/A 42 of 80
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Sentencing, Suspension of Sentence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Lisema Mathaba
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for culpable homicide was excessive given the mitigating circumstances
- 2 Whether the sentence for unlawful possession of a revolver was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Given the unusual and mitigating circumstances, justice required that the appellant serve no more than one year substantive imprisonment for culpable homicide, with the remainder of the sentence suspended on conditions.
Court Disposition
sentence varied
Orders
- Sentence on count 1 (culpable homicide) altered to three years imprisonment, two years suspended for three years on condition of no conviction for a crime of violence involving a firearm during suspension period.
- Fine on count 2 (unlawful possession of revolver) reduced to M50, with default provisions under s.298(2) and s.299 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Proclamation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment